Lorraine Hansberrys A Raisin In The Sun - The Importance of the Strug

The Importance of the Struggle in A Raisin in the Sun Why do some people persist notwithstanding insurmountable obstacles, while some others give up quickly or neer bother to try (Gunton 118)? A Raisin in the Sun, a play by Lorraine Hansberry, is a commentary on livelihood and our struggle to comprehend and arrest it. The last scene in the play between Asagai and Beneatha contrasts two contemporaneous views on why we keep on trying to change the future, and reaches the last that, far from being a means to an end, the real meaning of life is the struggle. Whether we succeed or not, our lives are purposeful only if we have tried to constitute the world a relegate place for ourselves and others- only, in other words, if we follow our daydreams. Many self-described realists dismiss this attitude as naive and unrealistic, that conclusion value in the pursuit of dreams is merely a self-induced delusion. Often, this perspective is obtained later on much bitter suffering for little or no sheer reason, as in the case of Beneatha Younger. Already a natural cynic due to the condition of the world into which she was born, a world where poor blacks with aspirations of something better were generally doomed, she became embittered with life when her dream of becoming a doctor was apparently shattered. From an outside perspective, it seems obvious that she reacted poorly the money her brother lost, after all, was not hers at all but her mothers, and how she expected to finance college without the death of her preceptor and the insurance check that followed is unclear. What is clear, however, is that the death of her long-held aspiration had a profound case on her. A dream glanced from afar brings disappointment when it collapses a dream that dies w... ...th the mundane, everyday anxieties of life, giving little thought to what our existence means or how we can change it. There is another reason, however, that we should strive to mold our suffer future, n o matter how futile a task it may seem. broken causes can be winnable, if enough people care about them to make them succeed there is always the hundredth dream. Works Cited Bloom, Harold. Twientieth-Century American Literature. crude York Chelsea House Publishers, 1986. Draper, James P. Black Literature Criticisms. Detroit Gale Research Incorporated, 1992. Gunton, Sharon R. Contemporary literary Criticisms. Detroit Gale Research Company, 1981. Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun. Literature and the Writing Process. Upper turn on River, New Jersey Prentice Hall, 1996. Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun. New York Signet, 1988.

Mahatma Gandhi: Influence, integrity, and Tide of Social change Essay

Mahatma Gandhi- Influence, Integrity and Tide of Social Change The past has witnessed lofty men in the form of kings, political lasters and sages who made the military man a better place to live. Only few were able to lead an entire nation and bring a significant miscellany to millions. umteen established power and authority and relied on the strength of armies. While, there was a man in India who explored the power of one he raised understanding with break through raising his voice. Mahatma Gandhi, a political and spiritual leader who led the modality of non-violence and truth did significant contribution to humanity and people of India. Gandhis final leadership principles and struggle curing India free from 200 years gray-haired British reign. Gandhi, with his impeccable influence and integrity, brought a positive change formulating a new India.In atomic number 16 Africa, when Gandhi politely asked his followers to help him volunteer for the victims of pneumonic plague ( in spite of knowing the risk of infection, by the communicable disease) they agreed and said, We go where you go (Barnabas & Clifford, 2012, p. 143, 4). With his credibility as storied humanitarian and leader, he influenced a group of Pathans to pledge for non-violence. He worked tooshie the scenes willingly, without the need for constant recognition or approval from others. In South Africa, he used to walk past the president Kryers digest in Johannesburg. One day there was a guard change the new guard pushed and kicked Gandhi into the street. One of his influential friends saw this and asked him to go to court. Gandhi matte up no resentment for the under-estimation of his self by the guard. Instead, he had forgiven his abuser. Gandhi preached forgiveness and incessantly had the consistency in his words and actions.He practiced service-leadership and voluntary subordination. When Zulu confusion took place, in South Africa, it injured many Zulus with no one to get word th eir injuries. Gandhi along with 23 of his volunteers nursed them back to health (Barnabas & Clifford, 2012). strange other leaders, who identified with the symbol of power, Gandhi identified with the symbol of service to humanity. He was people-centric and symbolized the people he served.Gandhi had an ability to empower people and truly believed in staff-development. He tried to mound a new free Indian who could stand on his own, to fight for freedom. Eventually, he developed a self-help elaboration in shining India. Wherever Gandhi went, he remained available for his followers and built real genuine relationships. He willingly spent his time with workers and carried out clerical work of the Congress office. Heath, the chairman of Indian Conciliation Group, capital of the United Kingdom in 1939 wrote about Gandhi, He is also the man of much tangible work, very approachable, lovable and humorous (Barnabas & Clifford, 2012, p. 140, 2).With Qualities corresponding integrity , people-centric, influence and abnegation Gandhi brought out a positive change in people across the globe. Even though, Gandhi was the leader of the Indian National Congress on its formation, he did not seek after influential posts. Instead, when young leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru rose up he chose him his successor even after license he did not take any position in the governing but remained humble as a servant to mankind. His deeds and fundamental principle got him inscribed with golden words in the pages of history. The father of the Nation unheedingly ignited people with non-violence, truth and patriotism.ReferencesBarnabas, A., & Clifford, P. S. (2012). Mahatma gandhi- an indian model ofservant leadership. world-wide journal of leadership studies, 7(2), 132-152. Retrieved from http//www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/ijls/new/vol7iss2/IJLS_Vol7Iss2_Barnabas_pp132-150.pdfBook, N. (n.d.). Ncert book english flamingo clear up xii. Retrieved from http//www.scribd.co m/doc/14329823/NCERT-Book-English-Flamingo-Class-XIICourt Verdict Published in Dailies SC set aside Karnataka (n.d.). Retrieved from http//courtverdict.blogspot.com/2011/05/sc-set-aside-karnataka-mlas.htmlPalshikar, K. (2012). Charismatic leadership. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, Retrieved from http//www.unc.edu/ketan/documents/Charismatic Leadership.pdf

Foundations of Learning and Collaborative Working Essay

Discuss the idea of cooperative imparting within your professional bea To be commensurate to understand the rationale, the polar factors influencing the outcome of cooperative running(a)s and how this can be applied to Perioperative practice, it is important to run finished a sound understanding of the image Collaborative functional. This imagination has many terminological variations, one of the to a greater extent frequently utilize is Inter-professional working(a). Hornby and Atkins (2000) state that collaborative working is a relationship amid two or more people, groups or organisations, working in concert to get and achieve a common purpose. Barrett et al (2005) decl bes that inter-professional working is the process whereby members of different professions and/or agencies work together to provide integrated health and/or social care for the benefit of service callrs. Disregarding what is seen as the place/incorrect terminology, the common denominator here is that all health care staff/ agencies are working together to provide the best health care realistic for patients and service users.There throw been many debates about the variation in terminology, Leathard (19945) refers to it as terminological quagmire that has been created due to rapid developments in practice, and in her analysis of terms, Leathard (19946) prefers to use the term multi-professional as it infers a wider group of professionals. In this instance the term Collaborative working will be used. everywhere the years there have been many drivers behind the rationale for collaborative working dating as far back as the 1960s in the USA, where Henderson (1966) reports that one hospital has weekly inter-professional ward conferences. The idea of collaborative working is therefore non a relatively new concept. In recent years increased emphasis has been placed on collaborative working and the need to work together due to changes in technology, function and government r eports. Technological advances such as telecommunication is now used by working(a) staff to live feed surgical procedures to opposite parts of the world. This has aided remote-area surgeons in their own practices (Shields & Werder 2002)Similarly, the entering of the field of study wellness Service (NHS) direct advice line has created a fashion in which doctors can consult patients over the telephone. However a study by the Economic and tender Research Council (2005) concluded that telemedicine is disappearing compared to NHS direct advice line. The introduction to new machinery which takes blood pressures automatically rather than manually, this and other technological advances have all required healthcare staff to change the shipway in which they work collaboratively. On the other hand, Government reports in addition change the way in which healthcare professionals work as they are often mandate measures. The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework (KSF) was introduced in 1 999 under the Agenda for Change. Day (2006) claims that the use of KSF will enable team leaders to identify gaps in the friendship and skills of their inter-professional teams.KSF is an essential requirement carried out every year to ensure impart progressions. Collaborative working is in like manner brought about by accountability. All healthcare professionals are governed by a professional body such as the Health Professions Council (HPC) in which it is their duty to ensure compliance with the legislation on the use of protected titles (HPC, 2008) Not only are registrants accountable to the HPC they are also accountable to statutory and criminal law which means healthcare professionals must interact with patients and staff on an acceptable level at the risk of being prosecuted for their actions. Another driver for collaborative working is seen through the ever scrutinizing media. A recent news report by Hughes (2011) highborn Emergency surgery patients lives at risk, say surge ons is one of the many examples of prejudicial media that is putting more pressure on healthcare professionals to work more collaboratively. On the other hand, many of the public viewers do not see the bias in the majority of these news reports and many examples of high-priced collaboration is missed.Resulting from the rationale behind why people work together it is important to understand the ways in which people do work together. Safe Surgery Saves Lives was an initiative that arose in 2006 by the World Health Organization and in 2008 a Surgical Safety Checklist was released globally. Research proved that postoperative complication rates fell by 36% on average and the checklist has also improved communication among the surgical teams. (Haynes, B.A et al, 2009, Pg 496) Many trusts also have a theatre list policy and this ensures that staff are working collaboratively to ensure the lists are correct, accurate and the most important procedures have been prioritised. The idea diffe rentiates among the trusts, but is most commonly referred to as a group hug. This is carried out each morning before any surgical procedures catch and it is a chance for staff to collaborate and share any ideas or concerns over that days list.A big part of collaborative work, especially in peri-operative care, is about recognising each others skills and richness thus the idea of inter-professional learning. Kenward & Kenward (2011, pg 35-39) outlines the importance of mentors, stating that mentors should act as manipulation models for students of all professions. Further promoting this the General Medical Council (2006) document on cracking Medical Practice propounds that doctors also act as role models to chasten and inspire and motivate others. It is evident that there are many ways in which healthcare staff work together, however major issues are still identified around the factors that influence the outcomes of collaborative working. Miscommunication has been identified as a reoccurring problem. Certain behavioral patterns among peri-operative staff which included ignoring requests they did not understand, helplessness to seek clarification, failing to speak loudly enough to be perceive and communicating information to the wrong person. (Gardezi et al 2009, pg 1390-1399)This can be fatal especially in the case of Elaine Bromiley who had undergone a routine sinus surgical procedure. Due to a breakdown in communication between surgeons, Elaine alas died. A video titled Just a routine operation, (LaerdalMedical, 2011) released afterward the death of Elaine Bromiley, identifies the breakdown in communication between the surgeons and the theatre nurses who had very witnessed the surgeons distress and suggested an alternative method to intubating the patient which was ignored. This concept has been previously recognised as professional separatism. DAmour et al (2005) argued that because professional groups are educated separately they are then i nteract into discipline-specific thinking.Research concluded that 69% of respondents to a questionnaire they set out inform disagreement between surgeons and nurses. And that 53.4% reported experiencing aggressive behavior from consultant surgeons (Coe and Gould, 2008, Pg 609-618) then meaning the outcomes of collaboration will suffer if all professionals do not interact and recognize the importance of other professionals skills. It is evident that collaboration and inter-professional working largely exists but with the constant changes in peri-operative practice as mentioned previously and the way healthcare is constantly observed, especially by the media, it is evident that collaborative working is a continuous development or a lifelong learning process. As technology changes and government policies are continually released it is inescapable that the ways in which healthcare professionals work together will also change and develop.ReferencesBarret, G, Sellman, D and Thomas. J ( 2005) Inter-professional working in Health and loving Care Professional Perspectives. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan. Coe, R and Gould, D (2008) Disagreement and aggression in the operating theatre. Journal of Advanced Nursing. garishness 61, Issue 6, Pg 609-618. Day, J (2006) Inter-professional working An essential guide for health-and social-care professionals. Cheltenham Nelson Thornes. DAmour, D, Ferrada-Videla, M, San Martin Rodrigues, L and Beaulieu, M (2005) The conceptual hind end for inter-professional Collaboration Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Inter-professional Care. Supplement 1, Pg 116-131. Economic and Social Research Council (2005) Telemedicine revolution is disappearing from the NHS. Online available at www.esrc.societytoday.ac.uk. (Accessed 8 October 2011) Gardezi, F, Lingard, L, Espin, S, Whyte, S, Orser, B and Baker, G.R (2009) Silence, power and communication in the operating room. Journal of Advanced Nursing. Volume 65, Issue 7, Pg 13 90-1399. General Medical Council (2006) Good Medical Practice guidelines working in teams. Online Available at http//www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/working_with_colleagues_working_in_teams.asp (Accessed 9 October 2011) Haynes, B.A, Weiser, G.T, Berry, R.W, Lipsitz, Sc.D et al (2009) A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. The New England Journal of Medicine. Volume 360, Issue 5, Pg 496. Health Professions Council (2008-09) proceed professional development annual report. Online Available at http//www.hpc-uk.org/publications/reports/ (Accessed 8 October 2011)Henderson, V (1966) The nature of Nursing A definition and its implications for practice, research and education. New York. Macmillan. Hornby, S and Atkins, J (2000) Collaborative Care Inter-professional, interagency and interpersonal. Oxford Blackwell. Hughes, D (2011) Emergency Surgery patients lives at risk, say surgeons. BBC news. Online Available at http//www.bbc.c o.uk/news/health-15098114 (Accessed 8 October 2011) Kenward, L and Kenward, L (2011) Promoting Inter-professional Care in the Perioperative environment. Nursing Standard. Volume 25, Issue 41, Pg 35-39. Proquest Online Available at http//proquest.umi.com/ (Accessed 9 October 2011) Laerdal Medical (2011) Just a Routine Operation Online Available at http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzlvgtPlof4 (Accessed 9 October 2011) Leathard, A (1994) Going Inter-professional Working Together for Health and Welfare. London Routledge. Shields, L and Werder, H (2002) Perioperative Nursing. Cambridge University Press.

Of Mice and Men †Critique Essay

Of Mice and Men, directed by Gary Sinise, is a quartette star mental exhibit comp ard to the book, written by outhouse Steinbeck in 1937. The cinema was produced 55 years later in 1992, yet still captures the folding companionship between George and Lennie. Sinise besides manages to depict Steinbecks main themes and develops the characters roughly up to the same level.The first difference I would exchangeable to let finish to prospective sense of hearings is how director Gary Sinise adapts the movie Of Mice and Men to viewers preferences and excludes John Steinbecks literary sense and purpose. For example, Steinbeck starts the novel with a scene after they lead run outside(a) from a ranch because of a mishap with Lennie incident anyy harassing a woman. Sinise begins with the scene just before- when Lennie and George are actually running away from the ranch admiters, equipped with horses and dogs, to save their lives. The working scenes have been lengthened to examine the audience the exhausting labor of the ranch hands. It is dumb-proofed for the viewers in establish to keep them interested and attached to the film.The aspects of filming, of course, differ from the aspects of the imagination. Gary Sinise essential use his own imagination and construct those images into reality on film. He has to cast the instruments jibe to science and appearance, develop scenes to suit the common peoples taste, he must worry about costumes, turnup, shooting, sets, set changes, time spans and the most trying of them all, working with other people to illustrate his view of Of Mice and Men. One bumt be too harsh in critiquing a movie when its predecessor is a novel by John Steinbeck. There trick be, naturally, absolutely no comparison to the human imagination, tho Sinise does it with only a few imperfections and adjustments to the plot. Let me commence with Sinises choice of casting. Lennie, played by John Malkovich, maintains the childlike, simple chara cter Steinbeck creates in his novel. Other film critics mogul disagree with me, only I believe that Malkovich was entirely convincing throughout his performance.George, played by Gary Sinise himself (and I must say that he must be partially self-satisfied to cast himself) was a confusing actor at times, changing his relationship to Lennie on several different occasions. He is, on one hand, very harsh towards Lennie and tells him what to do and what not to do, basically being domineering. On the other hand, however, George seems to be very compassionate and lovingness in his relationship with Lennie. Honestly, I was confused. Does George really want Lennie around, or is he just loyal to his promise to Lennies aunt, Clara? Who is George? Hope in full you can plow this sporadic behavior, because I certainly have not. An example of this is when George cleans the blood off of Lennies face after a fight- his movements are gentle and kind, whereas when George forces Lennie to brook a t the ranch while the guys go out for a drink. His attitudes in these two incidents are totally opposing each other.At to the lowest degree in Steinbecks book it was clear that although George was officious, he loved him. Georges annoyance is weaker than his profound unity and one-ness with him. Curleys married woman is described as a very racist, harmful, flirtatious person, who is all too aware of her proponent and consequently abuses it. For example, she threatens an innocent Crooks, Listen, Nigger, she said, You know what I can do to you if you unmortgaged your trap?1 Sinises depiction of her in the movie, however, is not as despicable. She holds a pitiable role and always is portrayed as the victim. The audience begins to sympathize with her, although, in the book, she was the one to initiate all the trouble.Curleys wife, in the novel, abused Lennies stupidity and the fact that he was fascinated by her- Sinise shows the opposite in the movie, because he represents her attrac tion to Lennie as one of friendship. Sinise also had to think about the skill of his actors. It seemed as though Sinise chose the actors well, because they fundamentally illustrated the feelings of the director and how he wanted to have the characters form relationships and emotions. Although the casting and level of skill was satisfactory, Sinise sometimes made scenes too extensive and irrelevant to the topic of the book. For example, when Lennie kills the whelp in the barn, he does not throw it away as he does in the book.Another similar difference is when Lennie accidentally kills Curleys wife by breaking her neck and he does not cover her in the hay, also left out from the novel. This is a mistake, because concealing the puppy and Curleys wife shows that Lennie is remorseful of the acts he has committed, and in the movie it is not shown like that. Sinise must also consider camera shooting. Obviously camera shots are not as effective as the descriptions in the book, because you can picture what you want, and not only what the director guesses you will want to see. Sinise, as all directors, tells the audience what to imagine. Therefore it is not as interesting as indication the book yourself and letting your imagination grow.So, if I were to recommend this movie to you, I would recommend reading the novel first. Reading Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck will show you what I am talking about in the movie. Because Steinbecks intentions are slightly altered in the film, you can fully appreciate this piece of theater whilst valuing the literature it sprung from. Sinise changes feelings, maybe not intentionally, but however hard he tried, he didnt succeed perfectly. I wont be too critical- perhaps he had to make cuts which thus excluding important relationship formations or conclusions. Overall the movie was good, but the book is of no comparison. Read Steinbecks version first, then dissolve for yourself. Me? Im only one opinion.1 John Steinbeck, Of Mice and M en, Penguin Books, (c)1937, London, England. knave 80.

Amazon: Online Shopping and Amazon.com Essay

Write a 1-page, single- plaza, 10-point font case analysis on the virago Case making sure to address the following questions1. On a scale of 1 (Very Poor) to 5 (Excellent), how would you rate Jeff Bezos as an entrepreneur? How would you rate him as an IT manager?2. Trace the evolution of the amazon.com telephone circuit from the follows launch in 1995 to the dot-com snap off in 2000. How did the connections strategy change over time? How did capabilities evolve? What place did the familiarity deliver to all stakeholders?3. Do you agree with the decision to fall out the Toys R Us know? Why did the order do the down? Should amazon.com do more deals like this? What impact does the Toys R Us deal guard on amazon.coms art simulation in aboriginal 2000?4. As a member of the Amazon.com board of directors in earliest 2001, what challenges did the alliance face and what actions would you take?Amazon.com is a global leader in online-retail. The gild was founded by Jeff Bezo s in Seattle in 1995, during the period of tech boom period of the 1990s. Since founding as an online deemseller, Amazon.com drastically grown to expand its harvest offerings, fulfillment, and node service. This outgrowth required huge investment fundss in technology and processes to support the coordination compound business. Today, Amazon .com sells, or auctions, books, music, videos, toys, videogames, consumer electronics, software, and home reapings. On a scale of 1 (Very Poor) to 5 (Excellent), I would rate Jeff Bezos 5out of 5 as an entrepreneur. Our vision is to be the worlds most consumer-centric company, where customers can go in to find anything they want to buy online.-Jeff Bezos. In 1994, Bezos was already a prospering investment banker with estimated six figure salary. Bezos definitely had huge potential to pinch in the company ranking but Jeff had a vision drive by a secret desire for the business of electronic sell.And fair four years after Bezos created Amazon.com, the realistic bookstore became the model for how e-commerce businesses should be run. Now there are thousands of online retailer following his steps. Amazon begun on its strong root by starting up the business in Seattle during the dot com bubble meant Amazon.com was entering a new industry from its early beginnings. And being located in Seattle meant the company had e-commerces top talents and leading experts nearby. Other thing Bezos drove Amazon as a very successful entrepreneur is that his decision to become a business that offered multiple product lines meeting various consumer needs. The company also created a barrier to entry by being the outgrowth handsome online bookseller and in the end a huge online retailer. I would rate Bezos 5 out of 5 as an IT manager as well. The company experienced extraordinary growth during and after the tech boom with customers change magnitude from 14 million in 1999 to over 20 million in 2000 .But with rising fulfillment cos ts, the company had not produced profits during these years. The challenge Bezos and Amazon faced was play the company profitable before bills ran out and operations would fix to cease or go bankrupt. In fact, were it not for the $318 million elevated through stock options in 1999 and another $680 million borrowed in early 2000, the company surely would have run out of cash. Strengths Amazon.com strengths begin in its roots. Starting up in Seattle during the dot com bubble meant Amazon.com was entering a new industry from its earliest beginnings. And being located in Seattle meant the company had e-commerces top talent and leading experts nearby.The companys beside strength came from its decision to become a business that offered multiple product lines meeting various consumer needs. The talent and industry that Amazon.com was surrounded by make it easy for the company to switch from a bookseller to retailer by utilizing virtual resources versus traditional physical requirement s much(prenominal) as store fronts and floor space. The company also created a barrier to entry by being the prototypical large online bookseller.Since its incorporation in 1994, Amazons business model had expanded from offering a simple internet marketplace for books to providing sack services to online retailers, storage solutions and a dramatically expanded product line. Nevertheless, contempt massive sales the company failed to produce a profit for shareholders and Amazon was on the brink of bankruptcy at the beginning of 2001. If I were a shareholder who received the companys 2000 annual report, I would have strongly agreed with CEO Jeff Bezos that the company must achieve positiveness by year-end 2001. I would recommend that the company accomplish this by cutting costs related to fulfillment and list and by increasing tax by working capitalizing on the previous years investments in infrastructure.While many expenditures in 2000 were related to Amazons efforts to down i ts strategy for growth, operating costs had also increased. Amazons fulfillment costs were 11 11% of sales in 1997 and 1998, increased to 14 14% in 1999. Beca employ e-Commerce was still new and just beginning to imbed customer trust, its critical that these costs be reduced without negatively impacting quality, speed of delivery or customer service. Because of Amazons large scale and repeatable processes, I would recommend a continuous amelioration strategy such as lean Six Sigma.Another field of operations of operational cash drain is inventory. After adding multiple new product lines and distribution centers in 2000, inventory management became a challenge for Amazon. In 1999, inventory turnover was 20% that of competitor Barnes and Noble and contributed to negative cash flow in 2000. Amazon would be well advised to use IT technology such as an advanced ERP to remediate estimate the inventory needed to meet demand without overstocking. In addition to cutting costs, Amazon mus t increase grossFrom its birth in 1994 to the dot com collapse in 2000, Amazon.com implemented a number of changes to its business strategy in attempt to stay on top of the e-commerce industry. Amazon.com started in 1994 as a simple online book retailer. Under this initial strategy, Amazon was receiving all of its revenue from its book sales (sales revenue model), and was popular because it was the first online retailer to do so. Amazon created value for customers early on by providing a space for customers to purchase a large variety of books in one place, thereby reducing the customers product calculate drastically from the traditional method of sack to brick & mortar book stores. In the early stages, Amazon benefitted from the first mover advantage, and had a dominating market share. This attracted huge investment capital in the late 1990s, and Amazon used this capital to broaden its offerings in order to stay on top of emerging competitors.In 1996, Amazon focused on mak ing the obtain experience on Amazon.com better for its customers. It revved up its browsing and search capabilities, and personalized the whole experience by offering customized layouts and recommendations based on what you had been looking at and purchasing. At this point, Amazon aimed to provide additional value to its customers by providing a personalized shopping experience. By 1998, Amazon started expanding into international markets and new products categories, turning into an online superstore and providing convenience and save reduced search costs to its customers. During 1999, Amazon began exploring complementary business models, such as auctions and marketplaces. Under these models, Amazon did not assume control of the inventory, and as such acted as an agent (generating additional revenues under the brokerage revenue model). In late 2000, Amazon saw additional opportunities to1994 Bezos, a N.Y. investment banker with no book publishing or retail experience, identifies b ook retailing as an industry segment that could exploit the power of emerging lucre technologies. Chooses Seattle as a location to be close to one of the largest book distributors. Writes the business plan and chooses the company name while driving itch country with his wife. 1995 Between July 1994, when the company was incorporated, and July 1995 when the Amazon.com online bookstore was officially launched, Bezos and a a few(prenominal) employees built the software that powered the website. By September 1995, the company was merchandising over $20,000 per week out of the founders garage. 1996 Amazon.com focused on enhancing its product and service offerings and capabilities with increasingly sophisticated browsing and focused search capabilities, personalized store layout and recommendations, shopping carts, 1 Click shopping (which was later on patented), wish lists, and greeting cards. Efforts to redefine and enhance the online shopping experience proceed and, in 1999, Amazon .com was one of the first online retailers to enable shopping through tuner devices. 1997 By the first quarter of 1997, Amazon.com revenues had increased to $16 million (which was uniform to the companys yearly revenues in 1996). Amazon.com went public on may 15, 1997. 1998 Beginning in 1998, Amazon.com began aggressivelyexpandinginto new product categories and intointernational markets. By early 2001, the company was not just an online bookstore, it was an online superstore selling a abundant variety of products in over 160 different countries. 1999 During 1999, Amazon.com beganexploringnew business models including, auctions (low-end and high- end) and marketplaces (zShops). For these businesses, Amazon.com provided software and services but did not assume control of inventory. As such, it acted as an agentnot a retailer. 2000

Maxine Hong Kingston: `No Name Woman`

In the explanation No Name Woman, Maxine Hong Kingston describes unique get down the stairs iodins skin of women in China and mixer traffic existing in the Chinese ordination. The stayd existence of the traditional Chinese family pattern or some(a) reasonable compromise thereof is often explained as necessary to the Chinese way of life, when, in fact, the way of life referred to has ceased to exist. This sometimes leads an author to give notice the fact that the family referred to may be a survival of an institution past tense its time as a functional prerequisite of the system in which it occurs rather than a prerequisite of the general system currently extant.The story vividly portrays social life of Chinese village people, oppression and phallic dominance affecting family traffic and destinies of women. The main questions are What is the circumstance of a family unit and an individual in Chinese society? What is the impact of social status and position of women on f amily grammatical construction and invokeual traffic?, What is the usance of economic relations in Chinese village and their impact on a family unit?The story can be interpreted as a historical discourse which unveils family structure and family relations excising in the society. From the story, readers cheat that in each affinity structure there are accredited generalized structural urgencys which essential be satisfied if the structure is to continue its existence. Maxine Hong Kingston depicts that it is essential that some distinctions on a sexual tooshie be brought out in every kinship structure, but the akin is also true for the society as a whole. Kingston describes altogether the village were kinsmen, and the titles shouted in loud country voices never allow kinship be forgotten. Any man at heart visiting outperform would deplete been neutralized as a l all over-brother .. younger brother, older brotherone hundred and fifteen relationship titles (Kingston n.d .).The role note of women relative to men in the kinship structure can never vary in mutualistly of that for women in the society at large.The question of procreation in terms of family structure is an extremely broad and complex force field addressed by Kingston. Three factors are always of great greatness in such educational structures. In general, these are (1) the content of the education, (2) the methods by which it is taught, and (3) the person or persons who carry out the teaching. there is a propensity to devote a larger proportion of ones concern to what is taught than to the other 2 categories (Stockman 27). Kingston describes that the methods used, the systems of rewards and punishments by which the learning process is reinforceed, and the roles of the primary teachers are of satisfactory sizeableness.The above remarks apply to family education in general and that of children raised from take over deep down the family in extra. Some special mention must als o be made of the education of members brought into the family from outside at a more mature age. at that place are two major types of such individualsthose brought in by word meaning and those brought in by uniting.The former may be brought in while quite young, and the earlier the age at which the adoption is made the more closely do the educational features of the case tally those of the raising of other children (Shu 199). To the degree that the adopted person is mature, and always in the case of marriage, there is the problem of introducing the new member to the specific family personalities and the particular family situation in which the new member will in following(a) act. Kingston tells readers thatWhen the family found a young man in the next village to be her husband, she had stood tractably beside the best rooster, his proxy, and promised before they met that she would be his forever. She was lucky that he was her age and she would be the first wife, an advantage secure now (Kingston, n.d.).There is in all family systems a specifically institutionalized method of integration of new members, though the rigidity of the system and the sphere of action cover by it may vary enormously. In these respects, the introduction of new members via marriage is far more important than any other mode of their introduction. Maxines aunt, face blame for exposing their communities to the threat of dying or actual death in relation to outside forces (Griffiths 353).The other major mode, adoption, never occupies so strategic a role numerically, since in every family there must be at least one such introduction by marriage, whereas adoption is not necessarily so ubiquitous in family systems. berth differentiation in family structure is depicted as the dispersion of persons among the respective(a) positions and activities distinguished in the kinship structure and hence the differential locating of the members of the structure. This immediately raises the ques tion of the terms on which differential arrangement is made. Brothers and sisters, impertinently men and women, had to efface their sexual color and present plain miens. distressing hair and eyes, a smile like no other, threatened the high-minded of five generations living under one roof (Kingston, n.d.). Kingston depicts that the members of society must always recognize some structure of role differentiation and orient their action to it.Therefore, although the primary basis of a given role differentiation might be, for example, political, the phenomena involved cannot be understood solely in terms of the political variable. Whatever the basis of the differential arrangement of members in a society or group, the action of members of the group and of outsiders in their relations with this group must in part be specifically orientated to this inescapable arrangement. Thus differentiation may be to a label degree interdependent with one or more of the other quartet structures to be discussed here, but it is never a dependent variable of one or of any combination of them.Before going further into this human face of role differentiation, however, a word or so more postulate be said on the functional background of the phenomenon (Lee 17). First, there is the distribution of individuals among the total number of positions of whatever sort in the structure under consideration. This must be done regardless of how numerous or vary either the positions or the individuals may be (Shapiro 5). The number and variety of twain categories will, of course, have substantial effect upon the concrete result, but the status of the requirement as a requirement is not affected by these considerations.The confines drawn between the sexes in these respects is sharp and is one of the main factors in the consideration of the family problems. There are, of course, other possibilities of variation along these lines. 1 other interesting aspect of role differentiation on a basis of sex distinction is that it is so frequently a focusing for stress in changing social systems. This usually puts considerable blackjack on those patterns which institutionalize a sex differential regardless of purpose criteria.My aunt could not have been the lone romantic who gave up everything for sex. Women in the old China did not choose (Kingston, n.d.). This is apt to be curiously true when the changes being made are in the direction of industrialization. The institutional basis of industrialized societies must lay peculiar stress on the differentiation of individuals on a universalistic basis.Economic allocation in kinship structure has been defined above as the distribution of the goods and serve making up the income of the units of the structure and of the goods and efforts making up the output of the units of the structure among the various members of the units. Economic activities and interrelations, insofar as their sphere is confined to kinship orientations, are best studied for present purposes as they operate within the family.There are, of course, all sorts of economic relations defined in the relational approach to kinship, but, changing as this does with every change of ego, description of the relations is confined to descriptions of egos relations with other specific relatives, and any systematic operations of kinship groups fall from the picture (Stockman 67). To survive physically, the members of these groups must obtain and lurch these requirements. In the village structure, spirits shimmered among the live creatures, balanced and held in sense of balance by time and land (Kingston, n.d.).The story portrays that the members of the familial and family groups must have food, shelter, clothing, and similar necessities if they are to survive physically. In patriarchal culture, these stories function within what Sandra Lee Bartky has called a pedagogy of shame that instructs young girls to learn close to the inherent danger and corru ption of their bodies (Griffiths 353). These requirements are not in the disposition of free goods as that concept is defined by the economists, and even if they were, the problem of distribution would still arise in the social context to starting line the effect of jealousies which might well arise no matter how homogenized the articles concerned might be intrinsically, and so forth.The link between the family groups and the larger economic aspects of the society as a whole has an additional importance since the status of the entire family in industrialized societies tends to be largely dependent upon the occupational role of the member or members upon whom the group depends for the bulk of its support. The reciprocal ohm question of the directness of the contribution to the family needs has as its limiting case the self-sufficient agricultural family. Here the family might produce all it consumed without part to exchange for any purpose with individuals or groups outside the family.The situation of the moderne industrial induceers family is at great variance with this since the overwhelming bulk of the income in this case is in the form of money powerearned for work having no necessary connection with the goods and services for which they are spent (Stockman 76). Critics play that Kingstones style of appropriation reveals the boundaries that define the older narrative as fortresses, and the ways these intellectual fortresses mirror other, fortress-like ideological formations (Shapiro 5).Kingston describes that this residual karyon of family duties which are performed directly is important because the duties are so often integrally connected with the substructure of role differentiation in general and that of sex roles in particular.The story shows that villagers depend upon the voluntary submission of the family members due to the inculcation of the value system of the society of which they are a part. The villagers punished her for playing as if she could have a private life, secret and apart from them (Kingstone n.d.). There have been cases of sons who have even stood unrestrained and permitted themselves to be beaten about to death by their fathers for faults committed.Such extremes are unusual, but they demonstrate the lengths to which these matters carry. new(prenominal) factors in the implementation of power and responsibility are the interrelations with other family substructures which bolster their exercise. But Maxine has increasing trouble applying this framework to the complexities of her familys story and to the complexities of American and Chinese societies (Lee 17). It has already been pointed out above that the patterns of economic allocation, role differentiation, and solidarity are intensely important in these respects. This must not be taken to indicate any particular general causal priority of one of these elements over the others.In sum, family structure depends upon and determines economic and social relations dominated in the society. The story No Name Women is a good historical showtime which helps to understand the role of family in economic relations and social values. duty here means the accountability to other individuals or groups of an individual or individuals for his or their own acts or the acts of others.Social values and strong family relations portray that social action within certain limits is always an extreme, and in a sense it is the symbol of social frustration. Nevertheless, if the family is to function as a unit, it must be possible to see to it that certain requirements are met, by force if necessary, and it must be possible to take a explicit person or persons to account if they fail to meet the family values.Works CitedGriffiths, J. weird Spaces Trauma, Cultural Memory, and the Female Body in Gayl Joness Corregidora and Maxine Hong Kingstons the Woman Warrior. Studies in the smart 38 (2006) 353. Kingston, Maxine Hong. No Name Woman. N.d. 2007. Lee, K. H. The Poetics of Liminality and Misidentification Winnifred Eatons Me and Maxine Hong Kingstons the Woman Warrior. Studies in the Literary whim 37 (2004) 17. Shapiro, E.H. Authentic Watermelon Maxine Hong Kingstons American Novel. MELUS 26 (2001) 5. Shu, Y. Cultural governance and Chinese-American Female Subjectivity Rethinking Kingstons Woman Warrior. MELUS 26 (2001) 199. Stockman, N. Understanding Chinese Society. regulation Press, 2000.

Mcdonald’s vs. Wendy’s Essay

In todays era the broken carb diets and obsessive exercise routines, people are more careful with nutrition choices, but also there comes the era where sporting provender restaurants charge the motivation for cheap intellectual nourishment quickly. The refrain, quick, and tardily diets though are unluckily arent always the healthiest choices for the person. There are two fast food restaurants that are now spreeing healthy menu choices low in plump downs and carbs without taking away the taste. McDonalds and Wendys both fall chthonic the same category for fast foods but both provide divergent characteristics in fitter choice menu items. The two fast food restaurants differ considerably but both Wendys and McDonalds put forward numerous salad choices.The most incredible breakthrough for these two fast food restaurants was the introduction of the healthier burger alternatives to their menus. Wendys one healthier sandwich to offer which is the Ultimate Chicken Grill whic h only has 6.5 grams of fat when loaded with toppings. Wendys is also the leader in various healthier meals. Wendys parched potatoes, minus all the large fatty toppings, are a expectant choice to a healthy meal. While Wendys had a discriminating healthier menu choices for a while, McDonalds however has begun to offer healthier meal choices. In todays era, McDonalds provides a entire variety of healthy alternatives including fruit yogurt parfaits and green apple slices for the childrens menu. McDonalds healthier sandwich choices include McVeggie Burger, Chicken Fajitas, and Whole drinking straw Chicken McGrill. Wendys presentation of healthier menu choices is sea captain. Wendys salads are large and fresh with topping sizes appropriate.McDonalds fails at establishing a superior presentation of healthier food choices. The McDonalds salads lack in appearance and freshness the salads appear just to be thrown together and lots look like wilted lettuce. Without a knife, eating sal ads can be overwhelming. The chicken pieces in the salads are sliced but not separated, and need to be broken down. Generally, the McDonalds salads lack freshness, and presentation.Wendys combination of salads has travel a popular menu choice. Wendys was the first major fast food chain to offer fast food salad as a meals chief(prenominal) course. Wendys offers four salad choices ranging from possessing 3 grams of fat to 30 grams depending on the salad toppings. The variety and quality of these salads has established an outstanding paper for this restaurant.Reaction to the popularity of salads, McDonalds is now offering salads as a main course menu choice. As well, in attempt to boast a healthier image. The fat content of McDonalds salads is also comparable to that of Wendys. It is frank that McDonalds effectively boasts a variety of decent tasty salads.Finally, several(prenominal) salad choices, meal variety, and good presentation are all considered when evaluating a fast food r estaurant. People now days constantly seek easy ways to gain nourishment, with fast food restaurants such as Wendys and McDonalds, making healthier food choices easier. The need to diet has finally pass a key selling point for many restaurants.

Reaction Paper- Asian and Global Crisis Essay

Reaction Paper Asian and international Crisis During the Asian and Global Crisis many of the criticisms are against accounting and accountants. In my further demandings, Ive read that during the Asian Crisis in 1997, where affected countries suffered severe setbacks in their economies and where development stagnated, the account profession, including its standards, policies and levels of tuition disclosures, had played a role in the start of the crisis, and by chance had even worsened it.Moreover, Ive also read that during both crises, the Asian Crisis and Global Crisis in 2008, in capable clarity in what was being measured, the upon things being measured or things being measured inappropriately, lack of standards, for arse aroundful transparency and poor ethical conduct, in short, poor bodied system is the main breadth and depth of the crises. As a future accountant, what ordain I do after wholly the doubts and criticisms against the profession?In my opinion, sufficient c larity on what to measure, measuring things appropriately, following the applicable standards, adequate transparency and good ethical conduct are the things that I should carry out. It should be clarified in the accountant on what is the thing that he/she should measure. If Im the accountant I should be knowledgeable on the personality and I should have understood necessary facts about the account when doing criterion or on examining the reasonableness of the measurement method determinationd by the vigilance.In addition, in measuring risks alike financial risk, I should use a valid and reliable risk measurement technique be sweat the nurture that Ill be giving will be the basis for the managements decision-making. If I have measured the things incorrectly or a wrong technique has been used, it could be misleading to the decision-making of the management and may cause chaos in the future to the company. In an accounting perspective, applicable gener eachy accepted accounting standards should be used in the accounts of the financials of the company.Strict respect should be observed so that minutes are properly recorded, summarized, separate and accounted for. Adequate disclosures should also be done. In the auditing perspective, as an auditor, auditing the company should be in accordance with the applicable generally accepted auditing standards. The auditor should be independent so that the opinion will be unbiased. I would like to emphasize that in compliance with the generally accepted auditing standards, the auditor should always take into consideration if the company provided adequate disclosures.Disclosure on square matters is really important for the users who dont have enough teaching regarding the matter will be informed. However, I have read in an article that there is also a lack of standards that also caused the charm on crises. Regarding the lack of standards, I think it is already in the transfer of the appropriate groups with author ities. Accountants demand to refocus the structuring of financial proceeding so that they abide by with generally accepted accounting conventions and that the scotch substance of financial transactions is communicated.More accountability and ethical awareness needs to be instilled in the individuals who deceitfully structure financial transactions. Regulatory bodies need to ensure much transparency by closing loopholes and better enforcement of accounting standards. Audit committees, need to be sure that a company is communicating the true economic reality of the financial transactions and financial position of the business entity. Off-balance-sheet pay is one of the most significant ways, among others, that the user of financial statements can be misled.It is time for regulatory bodies to eliminate overly rules-based standards, clearly state the economic objective of each standard, and require houses to disclose the economic motivations for the accounting practices they ado pt. sequence making judgment accountants need to be cautious and prudent. Accounting transactions and other events are sometimes uncertain but in tell to be relevant it should be reported in time. Accountants have to cast estimates requiring judgment to counter the uncertainty. Prudence is a key accounting principle which makes sure that assets and income are not overstated and liabilities and expenses are not understated.The bottom-line for all of these is to have good corporate governance. As defined by Robert M. Bushman, corporate governance structures serve 1) to ensure that minority shareholders receive reliable information about the value of firms and that a companys managers and large shareholders do not cheat them out of the value of their investments, and 2) to motivate managers to maximize firm value instead of pursuing personal objectives. I believe that all of the things I have mentioned are some of the keys that can help me as a future accountant in dealing the reali ty and to get out of all the doubts against the accounting profession.

Cultural Identity in Education Essay

Nowadays, the problem of heathenish indistinguishability should non be underestimated. In fact, in the modernistic globalized world there is a unshakable trend to losing national identicalness in the result of the amalgamation of assimilation, or, to assemble it more than precisely, in the result of the growing impact of western culture on other culture of the world. At the same time, individuals naturally send packingnot continue without individuation. This is why willingly or not they develop trustworthy ethnical individuality under the impact of a variety of internal and out-of-door factors that actually shape their character.In fact, individuals identity is inseparable from their personality. Consequently, piece transaction ar, to a substantial extent, predetermined by their heathenish identity that make dramatically their communication. As a result, it is always essential to take into precondition the peculiarities of ethnical identity of from each one i ndividual, oddly in education because modern education, being an extremely complicated process, is based on the idea that each individual is unique and his/her needs should be met in the process of education. heathenish identity in the modern world Before discussing cultural identity in the context of education, it is primarily necessary to briefly dwell upon the theory of cultural identity in the modern world. In fact, the modern imagination of cultural identity is based on two key elements, notably modern identity implies being alike other commonwealth at heart a group and common categorizing of outward phenomena, such as die hard or clothes people wear .However, in recent form such an attitude to identity is considered to be simplistic and specialists insist that it should be expanded. Obviously, such a definition of identity implies that cultural identity is essentially formed in the process of the development of individual, i. e. it is acquired in the result of genial congenator backships of an individual with other people. In stark contrast, to this position, there is an ultimately contrary visible horizon on cultural identity as the product of piece nature.To put it more precisely, A. J. Ayer insists that the general criteria of personal identity whitethorn be solely physical in nature that instrument that the idnividuals identity is based on his/her physical identity . Nowadays, such a view is widely criticized, and Baum for instance, underscores that in the postmodern world identity is becoming reconstruct and redefined and, what is more, the problem of identity is one of avoiding a fixed identity and memory our options open .Nevertheless, regardless the concept of flexible cultural identity it is necessary to underline that that it is still an integral part of the individuals personality. In actuality, we are neither only what we inherit nor only what we acquire unless, instead, stop from dynamic relationship between what we inheri t and what we acquire . In this respect, the tractability of cultural identity also implies individuals freedom which is actually based on what an individual inherits and what he/she acquires . Cultural identity in educational systemObviously, cultural identity is of a paramount sizeableness and its role in education is particularly significant because the individuals identity is constantly developing and, being submitted to changes, it can affect his/her personality dramatically. At the same time, as cultural identity is molded in the result of relationships between people, than the education process involves the interaction between people who open incompatible cultural identity, different fond and economic background, and whose views whitethorn vary significantly.At the same time, it is important to underline that the cultural identity of all agents of the education system, i. e. both educators and learners, is evenly important because they constantly reciprocally influence each other. Also, it is worthy of mention that cultural identity is touch by different factors, including inherit and acquired ones. This is why the cultural identity in the modern education system implies the necessity of the development of such a relationship that would provide the possibility to possibly fuller realize the secernate-so of each individual on the basis of his/her unique cultural identity.Unquestionably, cultural identity is partially inherited since it is kinda natural that an individual acquires certain stereotypes, norms and models of behavior from his/her parents and in the course of times such similarity of a child and parents are growing stronger as the child learns more from his/her parents and develops his/her cultural identity. In fact, in such a situation, a child inherits not just traditions and experience of his/her parents but also traditions and experience of the whole people, or culture, and naturally acquires the experience of this culture that h as been accumulating for decades and centuries.Furthermore, cultural identity is, to a significant extent, predetermined by social position of the individual and his/her social background. As a result, it is likely to estimate that cultural inheritances of an individual which he/she receives from his/her family, interact with social reality and position of the individual in the community. Consequently, it is in these cultural inheritances that much of our identity is constituted and is thus marked by the social tier to which we belong . Also, it should be said that the development of cultural identity oversteps in the process of education.It is important to realize that human beings are aware of the fact that they are affected by their cultural identity and the personal effects of their social environment that creates opportunities to overcome the strength of cultural inheritance that can occur in the process of education. As a result, it is possible to say that cultural identi ty can be changed and this change can occur in the process of education. Moreover, to a significant extent, cultural identity is shaped in the process of accomplishment that is a natural process for human beings who are simply programmed to learn.As a result, in the process of learning individuals create their own historical and cultural worlds, which are our products, and we become animals who are permanent inscribed in a process of learning and seek . The role of cultural identity in educational process Obviously, as the cultural identity is extremely important in the educational process, it is quite a natural that it is necessary to provide individuals with the opportunity to nonplus freedom in the development of their identity. What is more, their own cultural identity should not be by no means discriminated or simply ignored.In stark contrast, in the modern really democratic school, it is necessary to provide all school-age childs from different socio-cultural background with equal opportunities. However, in the current situation, it is quite difficult to do because the problem of equal opportunities is extremely serious and not often the cultural aspect is taken into consideration when educators attempt to solve this problem. To put it more precisely, it should be said that different students have different cultural identity.At the same time, there exist the dominant class in the hunting lodge which caprioles the primary role in the socio-economic life of society and tend to overleap in the cultural sphere. Naturally, such relations are extrapolated on schools as well. As a result, nowadays, there exist private schools where basically student from upper classes study and there are exoteric schools where students from reject classes persist . Naturally, in such a situation the teacher-student relationship may be affected dramatically.For instance, teachers fiting the middle class could touch inferior to the upper class students in private sch ools and, in contrast, feel superior in public schools in relation to cut down class students. Obviously, such attitudes are exclusively unacceptable for progressive educators. This is why it is extremely important to develop formula relationship with students with different cultural identity and treat them objectively avoiding despiteful attitude to upper class students or scornful attitude to lower class students.In fact, it is necessary to take into consideration the cultural identity of students and stimulate the development of the conscious and objective position of students in relation to their self- think of and, thus, change their cultural identity making it more objective. Practically, it means that working with lower class students it is necessary to stimulate their self esteem and make them feel respectful to their own cultural identity. It is not a secret that often the overwhelming majority of students in public schools represent lower class families.Consequently, a s the experience shows, their self esteem is quite low and they do not really believe that they can play any important role in the society. In fact, often they feel as if they are outcasts and, as some students believe, if they disappeared, no one would have even noticed their disappearance. In this respect, it is particularly dangerous when teachers ignore their social background and cultural identity since often such students have precise peculiar semantics, accents and syntax which do not correspond to the norms of standard lyric used in the modern education.As a result, the students from lower classes guess of being academically less successful than students from the middle and upper classes and, as a rule, they actually are. On searching possible solutions of such a situation, it is possible to recommend referring to the cultural identity of students that will help fracture understand their personality and reveal their real skills and abilities. To put it more precisely, th ey should have a chance to realize their skills and abilities regardless the linguistic specificity.It means that they may use different terms and language to explain different phenomena but they may be correct. Furthermore, in order to improve the position of lower class students with cultural identity which may be characterized as that of outcasts, it is possible to recommend the improvement of the current education policy which actually leads to separatism of public schools for in some scools the percentage of non-white students is reaching 100%, bandage white students from upper classes often turn to be in a privileged position studying at private schools, for instance.Conclusion Thus, victorious into account all above mentioned, it is possible to conclude that nowadays the cultural identity is extremely important and affects the educational process dramatically. It is necessary to underline that in the current situation cultural identity cannot remain fixed, especially in the sphere of education but, instead, should be constantly modified in order to make students conscious of their own cultural identity and that it is not always an objective concept.Moreover, one of the major tasks of progressive educators is to treat students equally and objectively, taking into consideration their cultural identity. What is more, teachers possess certain authority in education process, consequently, they should use it properly in order to avoid despiteful or scornful attitude to students. At the same time, in relation to lower class students, teachers could change the cultural identity of such students for violate and improve their self-esteem.

A Man for All Seasons (Friend or Foe) Essay

In the book, A part For All Seasons by Robert dash there atomic number 18 a few stack that bedt be placeed by Sir doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting Thomas everyplacemuch, the chief(prenominal) office in the book. crypticalard plentiful is definitely unrivaled of those men who cant be trustfulnessed and along with Thomas Cromwell the dickens destroy to a greater extent thans life slowly nevertheless surely and to the load of death. In the wipe off of the book more(prenominal) is exe biteed for high t close and his family goes from be very well off to having to start over. So this book shows that by dint of with(predicate) unimportantness of two, one can fall.There atomic number 18 two main reasons that fecund would be considered a Foe and those be his weak record record and his devalue of to a big(p)er extents friendly relationship. These be reasons to stimulate individual a Foe because if a person doesnt h gray accepted up to t replace ment deterrent examples then they are easily persuaded and if a person had the fellowship of to a greater extent then they would be idiots non to keep that friendly relationship and respect. In the following paragraphs I allowing give examples from the book of these reasons.One reason why residely is a Foe is because his moral casing isnt very strong and through issue the book there are legion(predicate) eras where it is sh declare that profuse doesnt expect a strong moral character, for example plenteous simply every hu gay race has his price? much No-no-no- productive But yes In money too. more than No no no well-to-do Or pleasure. Titles, wo spell, bricks-and-mortar, theres invariably some function. more Childish.In this quote (pg.4) it shows that cryptic can be bought and he is stressful to tell more that this is normal because everyone has his price. However, much, being the kind and forgiving patch he is, tries to explain that being competent to be bought is non normal and it is a moral weakness in someones character and tries to function him pound a job as a t each(prenominal)er where there is no temptation of bribery. An opposite example of how basss moral character is weak is when he is talking to Cromwell and Cromwell tells him that he is to become Secretary to the Council, which he asks loaded non tell anyone s roostly it. However when Cromwell resorts the question over and over, lively, finally, says he would smooth it would depend on the bribe. The quote is as follows (pg.71-72)Cromwell No ceremony, no court of lawship. Be seated. As his majesty would say. Yes soak up how I trust you.Rich Oh, I would never resound or stem a thing like that- Cromwell What kind of thing would you repeat or report?Rich Well, postal code said in friendship-may I say friendship?Cromwell If you like. Dyou conceptualize that-that you would never repeat or report anything et cetera?Rich YesCromwell No, only if in earnest.Rich W hy, yesCromwell Rich seriouslyRich It would depend what I was offered.In the beginning of the book more than trusts Rich as a friend and he supporters to bestow Rich a job as a librarian for the Duke of Norfolk, however, Rich stabs to a greater extent in the back by joining Cromwell, who dislikes more than very much and wants to imagine his demise. For instance in this quote he gives a steering data ab erupt a goblet given to more(prenominal) from a litigant that he was given by more who gave it to him in secret because he didnt want to be bribed because he feeling this was vituperate. The quote is as follows (pg.75-76)Cromwell Just so. This goblet that he gave you, how much was it deserving? Come along, Rich, he gave you a silver goblet. How much did you fix for it? Rich Fifty shillingsCromwell Could you go for me to that shop?Rich YesCromwell Where did he get it? It was a gift from a litigant, a wo man, wasnt it? Rich YesCromwell Which court? Chancery? No, wearyt g et drunk. In which court was this litigants case? Rich Court of RequestsCromwell There, that wasnt too painful, was it?Rich NoAnother example of how Rich devalues more(prenominal)s friendship is when he is confronted slightly it and denies it. This happens when Cromwell confronts Rich ab push through his friendship with more(prenominal) and he denies and when Cromwell says that more got him a job he devalues that by saying that more only recommended him to the Duke sluice though Rich couldnt have gotten the job him self-importance. This also shows that Rich doesnt hold to his views at a lower place pressure, which snitchs easily changed. The quote is as follows (pg.36-37)Cromwell .There you are in a comparative degree backwater-yet the spic-and-span Lord Chancellors an old friend of yours. Rich He isnt really my friendCromwell Oh, I thought he was.Rich In a sense he is.Cromwell Well, I always understood that he set you up in life. Rich He recommended me to the Duke.In concl usion Sir Thomas to a greater extent cant trust Richard Rich because of his morally weak character, he devalues to a greater extents friendship and he cracks under pressure. More also cant trust Cromwell and when Cromwell and Rich are united they are dangerous plain to though the smartest of men which More is one. I gestate that Rich by himself would not be considered as dangerous as Cromwell, however, that is just my opinion. Robert Bolts A mankind for All SeasonsRobert Bolts A worldly concern for All Seasons is a provoking historical drama. Thomas More, who is considered to be an average man, is entang conduct in the politics of the day and having to decide between his ingest welfare and his personal scruples. Thomas is an absolute saint of the church, nevertheless presently he had to choose between two different kinds of firmty. The theme seems to be recurring, regardless of the age or setting. In fact, it is the super acid globe who reminds the audition The 16th cen tury is the century of the common man. Like all the other centuries. By performing different characters with same personalities, usual Man enabled the auditory modality to run across the complexities of Mores character in the way of juxta coif.The Common Man in the get together is actually an alienation device, which was first invented by Bertolt Brecht. Here, the Common Man is an effective device to maintain interest, interpret the military action and convey the themes. He just like the Chorus in antique Greek drama, whose role was to review the action, seeks motivations and issues, foretell what might happen and explore any consequences. twain the Common Man and the Chorus relate the play to au departnces everyday life and their frame of reference in modern society. He is the linkage between the audiences and the stage. Just like how he is called, the Common Man, has all the feature of speechs frequent people does. He has ordinary ethics, ordinary doubts and ordinary concerns, which means he is always ready to compromise, distrustful of calvary and plays things low. He is the Old Adam, he is us all.Thomas More, who is the Chancellor of England during enthalpy 8th, is just the opposite of Common Man. At that time, atomic number 1 and his wife Catherine had been ineffective to birth a boy to be the heir of England, so Henry wanted to divorce with her and marry Anne Boleyn, further cannot get permission from the Pope. Henry tried very hard to get help from Thomas More because he is know to be an honest man and had very pricy reputation across the whole Europe. Henry pointed out extremely arrive atly that Because you are honest.Whats more to the purpose, youre known to be honest. However, More is a strong principled man who held his spirit firmly, he was allegiant to the church building, at the same time, as the Chancellor of England, he cannot be disloyal to the pansy. fundamental Wolsey, the former Chancellor, was executed for ineffici ent to help the index with the divorce. In arrange to keep himself and his family safe, Thomas More resolute to keep silent and seek harborion from the laws. If Mores self is unchangeable, the Common Mans weakness is in his readiness to admit and change into almost anything as a means to survive.Compared with the Common Man, the characteristic of honest of Thomas More is clearly observed. In displace One, More offered Rich a silver goblet, and spoke frankly and bluntly that the goblet was a bribe from a woman who had a case at the court. More can certainly not say so, but he didnt. When the King came to his house to talk about the divorce, the King pointed out immediately that Because you are honest. Whats more to the purpose, youre known to be honest. But when it comes to the Common Man, it all turned to be upside down. Matthew stole the wine of Thomas More, but lied about it In ball club to protect himself, the publican denied stoutly about knowing who Cromwell was J ailer chose not to report Sir Thomas Mores statements for his own safe. The Common Man lies to survive, he holds his belief on self preservation, he is not a great man, he cannot affect the decisivenesss of the Parliament, and he is only a common man, a man do whatever it takes to survive.More is also very loyal, to both(prenominal) the King and the Church. He didnt want to betray either side, so he chose to be silent. He is a liberal pretender and a man of integrity. Even he didnt want to swear to the Act, and resigned from his office, but he still concerned for the country. He warned Norfolk about threaten from the old Church and asked him to keep an eye on the B assemble. However, the Common Man doesnt have this good quality. Matthew, a person who should be loyal to his master, Sir Thomas More, offered education about him to Cromwell, Rich and Chapuys for money. He became one of the sources of Cromwell he sold his reason out and turned into an accomplice who sent More to deat h. When Sir Thomas More resigned from the position, he had to cut down Matthews wage, and without hesitate, Matthew left field him and went to be the servant of Rich Richard. These two mens acts are so different that we can see Thomas Mores characteristics of loyal clearly.Sir Thomas More is a man of principle as well. He held his belief in God so strong that zipper can bend it. He is a son of the Church. When rope-maker proposed to More that he wanted to marry his daughter, he refused for roper was an heretic. More k overbold that Roper was a good young man and admired him a lot, but he still said no for his principles. Roper married Margaret as soon as he turned back to the Church. In order to uphold the principles, he insisted not signing on the Act, even he is threatened by death. But the Common Man changes the principles according to convenient. At first, the boatman tries to bilk More for more money, but eventually, after More is dangerous to get close to, he even refu sed to take him home. Whether it is the Steward, the Boatman, the Publican or the Jailer, each persona is full of self-interest and simple pragmatism. It isnt difficult to keep alive, friends . . . just dont make trouble, or if you must(prenominal) make trouble, make the sort of trouble thats expected.The fiction of water appeared umteen times in the play. Water is flowing and changeable. The epoch of characters the Common Man portrays provides an image of that fluidity. When people are aligned with the Common Man, they can find it difficult to comprehend Thomas More. For he got so many opportunities to save his life and reunite with his families. Its hard to under put up his martyrdom and strong belief in the law. In the production line, Common Man knows the time and precisely when the stakes are too high, If its worth that much now, its worth my neck presently. I want no part of it. They can sort it out between them. I go through my deafness coming on.More also has an unders tanding of them, even when they separate his wine. Matthew, I shall miss you. spell the play centre on Mores choice to die rather than sign over his name on the Act, its easy to determine how Mores characteristics are presented to the audience. If More is delimitate with his talking to, a mans soul is his self, then the Common Man may best be defined by his philosophy, better a live rat than a short lion. Even at times the Common Man is dishonest, manipulating, unscrupulous and disloyal he is a master of living in the society. He changes his values easily like the water bounce back when tally on the bank. Thomas More held his unchangeable principlesThe alienation device has challenged our perspectives and left us with much to ponder. Ultimately, it is not only how we, the audience, perceive the Common Man or even how he sees himself. Most valuablely, it is the understanding that those in berth have of the Common Man and his motives, thoughtls and aspirations.ACT 1, SCENE 1 confabulation between Thomas More and Richard Rich.RICH Well there A friend of Sir Thomas and still no office? There must be something improper with him. MORE I thought we said friendshipThe Dean of St Pauls offers you a post with a house, a servant and fifty pounds a year. .RICH Its hard.MORE (grimly) Be a teacher.This conversation, as well as the previous one, sets up the contrast between Sir Thomas More and Richard Rich which is prevalent throughout the consummate play. In this opening scene, Rich and More argue over whether or not anyone can be bought. go Rich believes every man has his price, More refuses to agree with the notion that everybody could succumb to the temptations of status, power, wealth and women, or the notion of suffering. Rich means to say that men want to neutralise suffering and are therefore gained to the possibility of escape, and More instantly recognises this idea as one of Machaevellis. As Machaevelli is historically understood to have written on the government, and how putting political appropriateness above ethical issues and righteousness was the sensible approach to be taken in aquiring status, Richs corruptibility and the suppression of his conscience is foreshadowed in that Machaevellis theories both interest and attract him.More warns Rich of the temptation involved in aquiring a high-altitude job, and offers him an Italian silver cup. The silver cup symbolises Mores render to test and teach Rich, and is significant throughout the play as it represents the commencement exercise of Richs corruptibilty, which eventually escalates into much more venomous and criminal actions later on. The cup also represents the differences in principles and morailty between More and Rich. While Mores principles dont allow him to keep such a contaminated object, Rich jumps at the chance of receiving something so worth(predicate) for free.In between this opening conversation with More and the next important step in Richs complete loss of innocence, and Mores own demise, a number of changes occur in character relationships. Rich and Cromwells relationship becomes closer and more valuable. More recognises this and assumes Rich no longer requires Mores assistance in aquiring manipulation. Rich objects to this, claiming he would rather work with More than Cromwell, however More once again refuses Rich a job as he is certain Rich is untrustworthy and to an extent, dangerous. This is obvious in that small-arm More points out to Norfolk that Rich is in search of employment, he does not recommend him. Matthew (Mores servant and one representation of the common man), also predicts that Rich testament measuring to slide fastener, but as we see later on, Richs feigning and lack of morality and principles ultimately, and ironically, gets him everything he ever wanted.More talks to Cardinal Wolsey, the Lord Chancellor, who tries to change him to approve of King Henrys divorce, but More believes the divorce i s unacceptable without the Popes consent. Despite Wolseys warnings of consequences associated with disapproval, More refuses to set aside his beliefs and conform, giving a clear sixth sense into his belief in staying genuine to ones self and not conforming to something you dont agree with out of fear. This persona of More foreshadows his stance on events that come later in the play. More also refuses to allow Roper to marry his daughter Margaret due to Ropers dynamic sacred beliefs, labelling him a heretic, and disapproving of his inability to stay true to the English Church. Rich becomes Norfolks secretary and librarian, and Cromwell undermines him for this.Rich admits he isnt really friends with More anymore, which explains why he hasnt yet aquired a better job. However, when Cromwell offers him employment he declines, showing that he isnt ready to become a walking representation of Machaevellis theories yet, but later bribes Matthew for information on More which undermines his morality once again. Chapuys and Cromwell also bribe Matthew for information, which shows how most of the characters are immoral (especially contrasted to More) and highlights the difficulty More forget face in his newly appointed position as Lord Chancellor. After deceiving More, Rich attempts to convince More to give him a job once again by telling him of Chapuys and Cromwells bribery towards Matthew.More refuses again and Richs fierce behaviour and badgering spark fright in Mores family, who try to convice More to have Rich arrested. More believes the idea of this is necessary because Rich has not broken the law. King Henry visits More in person in an attempt to receive his approval, as the approval of a man with such an honest and moral reputation would be sure to make the King feel moral as well. However More is unable to discard his conscience, telling the King This is my right arm. Take your dagger and maxim it from my shoulder, and I will laugh and be thankful, if by that means I can come with Your Grace with a clear conscience. erst trance again he is portrayed as a man of convinced(p) morality, in that he wont approve of something he believes is wrong by the law, or unacceptable by God.CROMWELL Well, congratulations.RICH .You enjoyed itIn this Dialogue between Rich and Cromwell at The Loyal Subject, Cromwell bribes Rich with the position of Collector of Revenues for York in return for information. Rich is subtly coerced into admitting he will be bought, which pleases Cromwell in that he was relying on Richs corruptibility for information on More. Cromwell seeks Richs help in making the Kings divorce convenient, and despite Richs laments over his own corruptibility, he informs Cromwell of the bribe More once received.Cromwell believes More will change his stance on the Kings divorce, but Rich objects, saying More will not be easily frightened. While Rich represents how one can forfeit their own moral conscience in the face of gain, Cromwell appears to have nothing to gain, which makes him appear more evil in that he is trying to bring More down for the interest of it. Guilt is a recurring theme throughout the play, and is strongly exemplified in this extract as despite Richs own guilt, he easily succumbs to the temptation Cromwell offers to him, revealing his trailetic character traits which were first brought to light in the opening scene.Between Richs ultimate treachery of More, and complete transformation to a representative of Machaevellis theories, several events occur. Act two opens, which is two years later than the previous Act. The Act of achievement has been passed, which states that King Henry VIII is now the ear of the Church of England. Staying true to his religious beliefs, More is unable to continue in his position as Lord Chancellor due to his belief that the King is attacking the Church of England. His disapproval of the Kings actions force him to resign in order to keep his moral conscience, as he cant be so closely connected to someone he sees as having no conscience, let alone work for them. Cromwell intends to use the information he gained from Rich in order to blackmail More into recognising the King as the head of the English Church, and consenting to the Kings divorce.The next time we see Rich is when Cromwell questions More about his stance on the issues regarding the King, and Rich notes what it said. However, while the knowledge that the King isnt pleased with Mores actions, and the many attempts from everyone (even his family) to make him sign the Act of Succession unsettle More, he will not sacrifice his self for anything. More takes notice of Richs fancy clothes, which represent Richs gradual rise through position and status in society. It is now clear that the contrast in Richs and Mores ascent and descent are simultaneous with Richs lack of regard concerning moral principles, and Mores refusal to ignore his moral principles and conscience.More is eventual ly taken to prison house for refusing to agree to The Act of Succession, which deems the Kings first espousal (to Catherine) invalid, while confirming that Queen Annes children are the heirs to the throne. More feels he will be condemned to hell if he is to approve, and while his death has been forshadowed, the play argues that his sacrifice of life is nothing compared to the other characters who sacrifice themselves and their consciences. As Mores family comes to the Tower of London to see him, his venerate for them is highlighted, while his absolute love for God is further highlighted in that he is willing to sacrifice a happy life with his family who he loves so much in order to serve God, and protect what he believes to be right.CROMWELL (backs away. His face stiff with malevolence) My lords, I wish to call (raise piece) Sir Richard Rich ..NORFOLK Prisoner at the bar, you have been put up guilty on the charge of High treachery. The sentence of the court is that you shall be taken from the Court to the Tower, thence to the place of execution, and there your head shall be stricken from your body, and may God have mercy on your soulPrior to this extract (during Mores trial in which he is being charged with high treason), Cromwell attempts to convince the jury that Mores silence regarding the King can be interpreted as nothing but disapproval. More once again refuses to take the Act of Succession, as he sees taking the oath as lying to God, which would be sacrificing his self. Rich is called to the stand, and claims he hear More say Parliament has not the competency to declare Henry VIII the head of the Church of England. More denies this, and tells the court there were two other people present during the conversation with Rich, but Cromwell undercuts this by saying they could not be at the trial and heard nothing anyway.Ultimately, Mores attempts to teach Rich were futile and unsuccessful, as Richs actions directly led to Mores death. When More real ises his fate, he publicly denounces the Act of Supremacy and while he considers himself loyal to King Henry, he understands his premature death is because he refused to recognise the Kings marriage to Anne Boleyn. More also realises Rich has a new chain of office, and mildly scolds him Why Richard, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole worldbut for Wales?. Richs transformation to everything More ever despised is completed with his perjury. Ironically, Mores own refusal to perjure himself led to his death, while Richs willingness led to his financial and social prosperity.A Man for all seasonsIn Robert Bolts, A man for all seasons, Sir Thomas More did not die in vain. He stayed true to himself. More achieved more in the end because he didnt let death worry him. His last words illustrate this His will not refuse one who is so light-hearted to go (pg. 99). More understood that he was in line with his beliefs. More fought for what he believed in and refused to be mold ed into something that he wasnt. He knew that by dying, he would be proving a point to the public and let it be known that Cromwell had set him up.By More dying, he proved a point to himself and the public. That he was honorable and not sacking to succumb to the deceitful computeing of Cromwell and the King. I have not disobeyed my sovereign. I truly believe no man in England is safer than myself. (pg. 40) This clearly demonstrates the fact that More knew what he was on about and wasnt going to go against his beliefs for the sake of living.More strongly believed in the church and the Head of the Church, the Pope. He sustained in doing what you feel right in your heart, not what people tell you. More knew that if he stayed alive, it would have been sufferable, living in jail for the rest of his life, no job and little sight of family. He did what he thought was right. I do no harm, I say none harm, I cypher none harm. And if this be not enough to keep a man alive, in good fai th I long not to live(pg. 97)When More died it sent a message to the public that the Kin was wrong in what he was doing. As More died in front of a lot of people, it certainly showed to the public that it was honorable and he put his point across in the clear way. .but because I would not bend to the marriage (pg. 78) More is simply stating that he wouldnt agree with the King for the clear intention of staying alive.More knew that Cromwell had set he up, yet had no way of proving it and knew that no-one would believe him. Cromwell was hunting More for his beliefs not actions. Peoples avaritia justified that they could go after More in order to get what they wanted. An example of this Machiavellian principle is Richard Rich. He helped to kill More, he even lied under oath, all it get what he wanted. As More said to Cromwell, In matters of conscience, the loyal subject is more bounden to be loyal to his conscience than to any other thing. (pg. 92) This suggests that More believed in what he was saying and it didnt matter what Cromwell was saying, More simply dismissed it.More died for the fact that he would not succumb to the beliefs of the public and the monarchy. He stayed true to himself and this is the most important factor in life. If you are denying yourself to order to get something or somewhere, you are cheating yourself.A man for all seasonsA Man for All Seasons is the story of a man who knows who he is, expressing courageousness and faithfulness at all costs. In addition, every character has their own ends to meet, and the only distinguishable feature between them is how they go about it. some(prenominal) characters disregard all sense of morality as they plunge into an approach, which earlier encompasses self-interest. In all, most of the characters in the movie personify selfishness in one way or some other. Of course there are some whose selfishness is more noticeable than others however, at some point they are all inadequate in their cons ideration of others and live chiefly for personal profit. All bar for one, Sir Thomas More he is a man who subconsciously is a slave to his own conscience. He executes selfless acts in order to do what he knows is legal, and what he believes is right. He is one of very few people who have died with their integrity intact.Every other character sold themselves out to the king. To be honest, I think I would have sold myself out to the king to, if the consequence was to be beheaded if I did not. That is why I envy Sir Thomas because of his individualism, ethics, and courage he had during his stand against the King. Sir Thomas More was a character who was faced with a number of difficult choices. The study one being, when Henry VIIIs first wife was unable to produce an heir to the throne, he used that as an excuse for the pontiff to grant him a divorce, so he could marry a new wife. The King is backed by everyone on this request except the extremely regarded and religious Sir Thomas More. When the old Chancellor of England, named More his successor, it became important for Henry to get Mores support, but More could not be swayed. He make his decision to oppose the marriage early on, but even though it was something he did not waver from, he still had trouble with it.More made a very difficult decision in opposing the King and his family, but regardless of the consequences, he felt that he was morally ready and for him to choose any other path would have been impossible for he could not oppose the church and God. I think Alices and his daughter Margarets complaints probably had the most affect with More because he cared very deeply about his family and probably would have caved in to the King, if he had he not felt he was correct in his decision and there was no other alternative. Honestly, I think everyone should have moral values of some kind, but I do not know about having such strong morals that a person is willing to give up their life and family to sta nd for what they believe in. to a higher place all, Thomas More did what he did because his ultimate goal was to be with God. Consequently, he felt he had to do what God wanted and not what his king wanted him to do.In addition, having an attitude like that did put a damper on his relationship with his wife. I think they loved each other very much, but she did not feel entirely comprehended by him. It was evident that Thomass formidable intelligence fright her and she felt inferior to him. That was probably common in that day and time because women of that era rarely were educated, whereas the men were. In the end, their love for one another was evident in the scene up in Tower of London. Both of them getting teary eyed, knowing they will never get to see each other ever again. Even after that scene Thomas felt he was making the right decision because he was able to explain why he made the decision to go against the King. Chiefly, no one supported Mores decision not even his own family, but Mores family did support him.Especially his wife Alice she knew her husband better than any other human being. Therefore, when she finds herself at her limit in comprehending why her husband would take such a stand against the king, it bothers Thomas More. Mostly because she is his anchor in life and he involve her support, and needs her to understand why he is doing what he is doing. In the end, I think she understands why Thomas did what he did and the human risk of taking a principled stand against power. On the other hand, everyone else decided they were going to support King Henry VIII or be two faced about his moral standards. A great example of this was with the character, Oliver Cromwell, he represented the basic evilness of the film and threaten to have More executed for not acquiescing to the marriage.All he ever did was try and make the king happy. For instance, he said, When the King wants something done, I do it. I think Cromwell said this because he di d not want his head to be cut off therefore, all he did was kiss up to the king. In the end, it did not help him because he was tried and found guilty of treason. One character that did not get tried for treason was Richard Rich. He was one of the characters that betrayed Sir Thomas More. Throughout the film it was obvious to the viewer Richard Rich only cared about himself. By far, his worse act of selfishness was when he lied and sold out Thomas More for he could become Attorney General of Wales. As a result, I think Rich was a piece of meth for doing such acts of treachery to an old friend. I also believe Thomas More thought so because he said, Richard, it profits a man nothing to trade his soul for the whole world, but for Wales.I thought that was a tremendous slap in the face to Richard. Another character that betrayed Thomas More after being his friend was the Duke of Norfolk, he foolishly badgered More to relent and join the Kings supporters. Obviously he did not realiz ing the depth of Mores integrity. Consequently, Norfolk conducted the trial for High Treason against his former friend, never aware that More had eased his passage from sure friend to state enemy by purposely offending him. Above all, that is why I envy Sir Thomas More because of his individualism, ethics, and courage he had throughout his stand against King Henry VIII. It would have been hard for a person to purposely make an enemy out of a good friend. Even when you know it is for their own good.I do not think it would be possible for me to do that, which is why I envy Thomas. deflexion from envying him I did not agree with what he did. In my eyes, putting his morals before his family was wrong of him. There had to have been other ways to voice your opinion back in that era without losing your head. I feel Sir Thomas More caused great suffering to his family that was unnecessary. In conclusion, I think you made us watch the movie for that particular reason. To show us how diver se each persons attitude is towards their higher power. Now geezerhood in America, people are permitted to voice their opinion, and we take it for granted not realizing what a privilege it is to be able to speak out with no consequences.