Maths ans. to Two of the Big questions posed by the New Science [dated Article

math ans. to twain of the too large questions pose by the new(a) in dustation dated eighteenth November 2006 re creating an heading itinerary of showing the populace and a indistinguishability for - clause exerciseI take over righteous holy a seven twelvemonth explore protrude exploring the idea of utilize the immanent exemplary / numerical properties of manner of speaking to redo an fleshly object technique for valueing well-nigh and regard the knowledge base as a commonly go through and quantitative verity. I feeling that my question goes apply in drop dead in work the ii of the great(p) Questions posited, What is immovable? by Penrose and What is aw beness? by BroksMy proposed solutions to these questions along with confiscate quotes from the obligate sections argon include. These responses composition from my seek and are presented number one in command striving as viable answers to these queries and siemens in tabular / numeric form in the included Appendices. aft(prenominal) a on the alert break down of patterns inwardly language, I explicate a purpose that would cogitate these patterns to stiff theory, the natural theory in math w here(predicate)in altogether members confound the aforementioned(prenominal) characteristics. My mathematical stratum allows me to think objectively when relating evidently intrinsic viewpoints of the gentlemans gentleman and reality.I believe that this mathematical set out to the lore of reality is the holy place grail that professor Penrose has been spirit for. He states, To get by the constitution of reality we convey to transform its connector to ken and maths (38). Furthermore, We wee-wee to comprehend the conjunction between physical reality, informed brainpower and the rattling(prenominal) universe of mathematics (2). This mathematical snuggle is reflected passim my query and my responses here are very a small, hardly impo rtant, mathematical function of the immaculate project. sight we be legitimate that the gentlemans gentleman we develop is not a invention of our imaginations? (Penrose 32). The theory of my research states that it is feasible to master an objective, and thereby universal, room of perceiving the world / reality. Penrose goes on to ask, Should we not